If you have chosen to work directly with managed care companies and now find yourself struggling to work effectively with them, you may not be speaking their language. Theirs is the language of behavioral health care. As such, it focuses on impairments.
Impairments are behavioral dysfunctions. They are quantifiable and measurable.
Biopsychological impairments address both the biological and psychological spheres of a client’s life and include such things as altered sleep, learning disabilities, and psychotic thought.
Family / significant other impairments are those that reference a client’s difficulty in relating to significant others such as family or marital dysfunction, emotional / physical trauma as a victim or perpetrator, and even running away from home.
Social / interpersonal impairments are those that address a client’s destructive, chaotic, or unmanageable chaotic world. These impairments may include manipulativeness, uncommunicativeness, egocentricity, or oppositionalism.
Future / achievement impairments refer to a client’s ability to hope and plan for the future. These impairments include hopelessness, inadequate survival or health care skills, and educational performance deficits.
Some managed care companies refer to this list of impairments as a Patient Impairment Profile or PIP. When I have worked with managed care in the past, I have used the PIP to structure my reviews and negotiations for authorization of care. It is an efficient and professional way to address your concerns in the language that best reflects managed care’s concerns.
Here are some recommendations for you to consider when communicating with professionals within the managed care industry about your clients.
- Do not provide a lengthy problem list of every concern that you have.
- Do provide a list of impairments that you intend to successfully treat.
- Start with biopsychological impairments because they carry the most weight with managed care.
- Impairments should be consistent with DSM-IV symptomology.
- Include any impairment that has the potential to directly impact treatment.
- Avoid the use of Axis II diagnoses and V codes whenever possible.
In the world of managed care, clinical / medical necessity is defined by these impairments. It’s important for you to know that by the industry standards of managed care, impairments (and not diagnoses) are the reasons that a client requires treatment. And, it is impairments that are used to determine reimbursements for your fees. You will not foster good will or bridge the culture gaps with managed care by addressing clinical “issues” that do not easily lend themselves to your treatment or repair. Keep this in mind when you are going back to them to request extending their authorization for your client to continue working with you.
If you are finding this post useful, let me know and I’ll share a bit more with you about working with managed care. And, if I don’t hear from you, I’ll happily revert back to my managed-care free emphasis in this blog!
Samantha says
Great post! Please keep posting more tips for effectively working with managed care. I hope to soon build my own practice, and I know that the bulk of my work will be done with clients with insurance.
Tamara Suttle says
Samantha, thanks so much for dropping in here to chat. I am interested in your decision to make the bulk of your work focused on working directly with insurance. Care to share? I was just commenting on my colleague, Warren Corsen’s blog, noting that although some mental health professionals make this choice, it’s certainly not required to have a strong and vibrant private practice. Always interested in hearing others’ thoughts on this matter.
Samantha says
The practice that I hope to join once my postdoc is complete is currently searching for alternative avenues to relying mostly on insurance. I guess once I join, I can really look into seeing clients who are able to self-pay. One thing my practice does not accept is clients on a sliding scale fee. I need to ask the practice administrator why this is.
Tamara Suttle says
Hi, Samantha! I’m so glad to have you join the conversation here. You absolutely can attract cash-paying clients and I encourage you to do so! And, before you decide whether or not to utilize a sliding scale in your practice, I would encourage you to get really clear about your motivation to do so . . . . If providing a sliding scale fee is about providing charitable services, there are many ways to do so without a sliding scale fee. And, if your motivation is about fear . . . as in afraid you won’t be able to attract full-fee paying clients, that’s not a good reason to offer a sliding scale fee. Making business decisions based on fear is never a good practice.
Check out some of my previous posts on reducing your fees here and here.
Samantha, I hope you’ll drop in often to chat as we continue to build a strong and vibrant private practice here at Private Practice from the Inside Out!
Tim says
Your post is highly relevant to a growing number of practices. As healthcare continues to evolve as a result of Federal healthcare mandates, I am becoming increasingly aware of my mental shift from therapy to a medical mindset in order to translate reality into the language of the administrator uneducated in the world of mental and emotional healthcare. This is not a shift designed to manipulate the antiquated and inadequate bureaucratic procedures. It is a rendering of terminology to accommodate a glossary of physical, visible, x-ray-able, medicate-able, tangible symptoms foreign to the less tangible, sometimes not quantifiable symptoms , often connected to mental processes involved in relations systems, which affect general health in a medically necessary way; but not couched in the language of administrators expecting the jargon and codes of the ER dealing with the physiology of an individual. Articles of insight into best practices in dealing with the coming onslaught of change will certainly be pertinent to the future success in many practices.
Thanks…
Tim
Tamara Suttle says
Hi, Tim! Welcome to Private Practice from the Inside Out! I, too, find the language of behavioral health to be too reductionist for my taste. The services I offer my counseling clients straddle areas ranging from traditional therapy to support of personal growth. It may or may not fall neatly into the category of “medical necessity.” My work is as much art as it is science and I rail at the thought of lessening the art to shore up the “evidence.” We are desperately in need of best practices being touted and researched – but I believe that it is precisely the craft that creates the success rather than merely the science.
Tim, I hope you’ll drop back in often to share your thoughts as we continue to grapple with managed care and building stronger private practices!
BrendaBomgardner says
Tamara,
Your posts are useful and informative. Thank you, Brenda
Tamara Suttle says
Thanks, Brenda! That’s so kind of you to say!
Bethany says
Yes, Tamara! As I start to apply to be on panels. this type of information is extremely helpful!!
Thanks again for sharing this information!
Bethany
Tamara Suttle says
So glad to hear it, Bethany! I’ll bring you more on managed care, soon!
Nina Danhorn says
Tamara, thank you so much for sharing your expertise.
I am new to all of this and really appreciate this information.
Can’t wait to read more.
Nina
Tamara Suttle says
Nina! Thanks so much for dropping in here to chat and welcome! I’m always happy to have creative arts therapists join our growing community! Let me know when I / we can help support you on your journey! Happy to share what I know with you!